New Conference Metrics: Twitter Hashtags

I had the privilege of presenting at Ideagoras November 17, 2011 in Madrid. Our hosts, the BBVA Center for Innovation, were gracious enough to provide two simultaneous translators which made it possible for me, a non-Spanish speaker, to participate fully in the conference.

The translation not only allowed me to listen and learn, it also allowed me to participate in the conversation using the hashtag, #ideagoras. This being a social media in healthcare conference, at the end of the day, the organizer, Angel Gonzales sent out a link with the analytics of what happened on Twitter the days surrounding the conference. 

Ideagoras-analytics

http://www.foxepractice.com/healthcare-hashtags/Ideagoras/

Having an official hashtag for a conference does change the experience of the attendees as well as people who are following the conversation remotely. There were only about 100 people at the venue but there were 424 unique Twitter accounts that used the hashtag that day, extending the reach of the ideas beyond the four walls.

The official hashtag also allowed the attendees to interact with each other on a deeper level. As a speaker I got to answer questions and go deeper on topics via tweets that I could only touch on due to time constraints.

If you are planning a conference, find a unique and short official hashtag, print it on any agendas or materials, and encourage your attendees to use it. After the conference, use a tool like that found on www.foxpractice.com or http://hootsuite.com/ to analyze the Twitter activity, it's one of many conference metrics that you can use to plan the next conference or give to sponsors. 

Posted

Photos from Medicine 2.0 2009 w/ @jensmccabe @rdjfraser @steinibrown #med2

Found some old photos of the Medicine 2.0 panel on social media in healthcare I was on with Jen McCabe, Rob Fraser, Saad Alaam, chaired by Adalsteinn Brown, Assistant Deputy Minister of the Ontario Minister of Health and Long-Term Care a few years ago in Toronto. 

 

Coverage of the panel on the official Medicine 2.0 blog: http://medicine20congress.blogspot.com/2009/09/blogs-eviscerating-pride-and-p...

Find the list of presentations from Medicine 2.0 2009 here.

 

Posted

How I Became an Apple Fanboy (or a Tale of Two Customer Service Departments)

I've spoken and written a lot in the past few years about social marketing and the principals underneath are pretty simple. Have a good product. Treat your customers well. Without those two solid foundations supporting your brand, it's extremely difficult to get traction. Here's a personal story of my experience with Apple and Verizon. It's pretty clear who will get my business and praise in the future.

I made the switch from my EVO to a Verizon iPhone 4 last week and it's the first Apple iPhone/iPod that I bought. It's also one of my first experiences at the Apple Store when I had a technical problem. My switch to Mac's had started at various startups a few years ago where a Macbook was standard issue. I got used to the ease of use in the Apple experience, since as I've gotten older, I became a fan of something I once said to a friend of mine regarding his 3 vehicles in various states of disrepair, "You know James, most of the time I just want to get from A to B, I don't really care how I get there, nor do I want to have to fix just one part to get there."

Rewind about 25 years, to my first experiences with electronics.

The first home computer that we had was and Apple IIe bought by my father in the late 80's. I remember making the turtle move with BASIC and the green screen but I can't say that I was very attached to the machine itself. By the time I was 15, I had fallen in with the technical crowd at school who were hacking their own PC's out of parts ordered from San Jose, California. California was a pretty exotic place to a bunch of teenagers from rural New York. My first major purchase at age 16, for $1008, was a cloned PC with 16 MB of RAM. It came in the mail from Silicon Valley and over the next few years I upgraded the memory, the graphics card, and the motherboard. We sneered derisively at the Mac fanboys (we only knew them from the online BBS's, there were none at my high school) who could not swap out cards, change their motherboard, or customize their machines. 

By the time I was 18, I was immersed in Usenet newsgroups and local BBS's. Apple was still seen by me and everyone I respected as an operating system for the non-hardcore geek-wanna-be who couldn't get into the guts of their own machine. Apple fanboys were on par with AOL users, the latter were seen as the "end of the Internet as we knew it".

Fast forward to February 10th, 2011. I was going to go into a store to buy a Verizon iPhone. I was already immersed in the Apple experience, having bought my own Macbook about a year before and had won an iPad at a raffle. Owning the iPhone would be the final piece of the Apple experience. I wasn't sure how I felt about it, but Roving Screens needed all the test devices we could get our hands on and we also needed to make sure Mobimileage did not behave differently on a CDMA network.

The Best Buy employee transferred my data over from the HTC EVO 4G and got about 4000 entries. I know I don't have 4000 people's phone numbers in my phone but I wasn't sure how many I really had.

It turned out the high number of contacts is due to Google's crazy idea of what constitutes a phone contact. Here's how the Android OS handles contacts: it assume that anyone you've ever emailed from Gmail, every Twitter and Facebook friend is the same as a phone contact. (note to any Google engineers reading this: a phone contact is a lot more personal than someone I may or may not have emailed from Gmail, a Twitter follower, or a college friend who found me on Facebook) I ended up with quadruples of many contacts since if I have your phone number, it's likely that I've emailed you, follow you on Twitter, and we are friends on Facebook. We made some changes to the EVO's settings and he did the transfer again, eliminating the quadruples problem but I still had about 2000 entries. I wasn't sure if I had 2000 phone contacts but given that I had already been in the store for an hour, I did a quick spot check that everyone's information was in the new iPhone and left the store.

Two days later, as I'm searching through my phone, I realized that there were still duplicates. Worse, 1700 Twitter contacts were in the iPhone, basically as blank names with no other information. I was in downtown Palo Alto at the time and decided to visit the local Verizon store, since they were now going to be getting my $100+ per month instead of Sprint.

The girl at the counter took both my phones, the EVO and the iPhone. We unsync'd Gmail, Twitter, Facebook and tried to transfer just my phone contacts over. I waited for about half an hour while she tried the transfer a few different ways in the back- and at the end she handed back my phone with triplicate entries and 4000 contacts. She said that she couldn't help me and that they were helping me as a courtesy since I had not purchased the iPhone from their store. "We usually charge $20 for this transfer service. You'll just have to go through the (now 4000) entries and delete them on your own. I'm not sure if you can do this on your computer but if not you can go through them individually on your phone. Or maybe you can take it to the Apple Store and they can help you."

Wow. That was the worst customer service ever. Verizon's customer service rep's made the problem WORSE and walked away.

I walked the 3 blocks to the Apple Store and was approached by someone immediately after walking in. He asked why I came to the store today and I told him about my issues with transferring my contacts over. I didn't have an appointment but Peter Song, one of the Genius Bar employees said, "We should be able to figure this out." First he looked at the list of phones his Cellbright machine supported; it turned out the HTC EVO was not one of them. Next he tried the HTC sync to get just the phone contacts. His computer locked up. In between his other appointments, he came back to see if the next sync'ing system would get just the 400 phone contacts. No dice. 

He then asked me, "Does this have an SD card in it?" and I said, "Yes, there's a micro-SD card that I've used to transfer photos." He transferred just the phone contacts on to the card, put the card into a reader, connected to the Mac, and transferred just the phone contacts on to the iPhone.

Five minutes later, I walked out with all of the data I wanted on my new phone and Apple gained another fanboy based on superior customer service.

If you're working on branding or marketing for a consumer facing company, here are the thoughts that I have, as a consumer:

  • When my Verizon phone contract is up, would I hesitate for a nanosecond before jumping to whoever offers me a better deal? No.
  • If Apple comes out with their next device, would I look and consider buying it? You bet.

If Apple just had good customer service that wouldn't have been enough to turn me into a fan but having a good product AND excellent customer service was.

On top of the amount I will spend on electronics in the future, think about the positive or negative advice I will give to family and friends when they ask me how I like Verizon or my new iPhone and how my story will influence their buying decisions. This is advertising and loyalty that money can't buy.

Follow me on Twitter: @chiah

Posted

Gamification Summit Brings Many Industries Together

Gamification-summit-logo

Yesterday the first Gamification Summit convened in San Francisco bringing together many different segments of the Silicon Valley technology market. The "Game Crawl" organized by TechCentralSF after the conference gave attendees a chance to mingle. The most surprising part of the event was the large cross section of industries represented. There was the expected influx of game and startup executives but also NBC, Playboy Enterprises, a program insurance company, and healthcare companies.

Gamification is seen by these executives as the new loyalty program and a way to keep users/consumers engaged. Social engagement is no longer seen to be enough, adding game mechanics and metrics is the new thing in the next year for brands.

Powering these new take on loyalty programs are two startups that sponsored the pub crawl.

Badgeville described their business as a white label social rewards and analytics platform, a new twist on the traditional loyalty program. Now you can reward consumers not just for purchases but also desired behaviors like "sharing with social network" or "uploading content".

Bunchball has been building its platform for the past 4 years and power programs for large brands like NBC, Comcast, USA Networks,SyFy, and Hasbro. The API's make it easy to plug in a game, leaderboards, and integration with social networks.

Posted

Layers of Social Media Presence #hcsm

I've been tweeting about how I use different Social Media networks and decided I should have a longer post about all the thoughts I have on the topic instead of doling it out in 140 character disjointed thoughts. Before I start, I do want to say that this is the way I use the different networks and what has worked for me over the past few years. Your mileage my vary and you may find that another way works better.

First the different services I use on a regular basis:

1. Twitter

Open network, I live-tweet talks, post professional links and some personal information. It's the most open of all the ones I use, since anyone with an internet connection can see everything I post. If someone chooses to, they can even get text updates every time I tweet.

My tendency is to keep the stream professional and to talk to other people on Twitter who are in the industries that I'm involved in.

2. Blogs (Professional at www.thesubtleinfluence.com and Personal at chiah.posterous.com)

Open networks, I blog on social marketing, mobile, communities, healthcare at www.thesubtleinfluence.com and whatever I find interesting at chiah.posterous.com. The personal blog reflects my interests in technology, food, and what I'm looking at that seems relevant to people who know me.

I also guest blog on other properties, usually I match the tone and writing to the style that has already been established.

3. LinkedIn

Professional network of people I've worked with. For me LinkedIn is a way for me to keep track of my professional network.

3. Facebook

The most personal of all the networks that I use. This is where I have more photos, interests, and interact with people I already know.

The way I look at the different networks is how do I want to use them and also what is the social norm on each. Twitter is a large public gathering place where lots of conversations are happening at the same time. My blogs are public speaking forums where I can put ideas out into the world. LinkedIn is for keeping in touch with professional contacts. Facebook is for friends and family.

What I put into my Facebook network will not be appropriate for LinkedIn and perhaps vice versa. I choose not to share who I had drinks with on the open networks, as a general rule. 

If I were a health provider, I would choose to not link to patients on Facebook. LinkedIn would be a gray area. Blogs and Twitter would be open but I would not discuss any personally identifying information on those networks. If a patient were to contact me through an open network, I would politely direct them into a private communication channel. If a patient were to contact me through Facebook, I would decline the link and add in a brief sentence that I use this for close friends and family only.

On a blog or Twitter post, I would encourage people to communicate specifics privately but be willing to have general discussions.

I'd be interested in hearing any thoughts or experiences other people have had or ways you're using these networks.

 

 

Filed under  //  Social Media  
Posted

Rockmelt, the New Social Browser Experience

Rockmelt

           Rockmelt Icon

Got an invite to Rockmelt this afternoon courtesy of Kurt Collins (@timesync) and since it is supposed to be the new social web experience, I downloaded it. First though, I had to get through the slightly confusing invite experience. If I were not on the phone with Kurt while he was inviting me we may not have figured out how it worked. You send an invite to a friend, that friend has to click on www.rockmelt.com, connect via Facebook Connect, and agree to use Facebook Connect to sign up for beta. The original inviter then has to go back into Rockmelt and click "hook'em up" once the friend's name shows up.

Rockmelt crashed the first time I launched the browser, which is always a bad way to start with a new program. I opened up the two webmail systems that I use and another tab in the same window for browsing. I sign in to Twitter three times and get the ever spinning circle. The Facebook integration is better, it is fairly robust, meaning I saw status messages.

My major complaint is performance since when I was running those 3 tabs, the browser froze and took my MacBook with it. I had to quit Rockmelt and restart the computer before I could type in to other services, like Seesmic Desktop or Safari. The second complaint I have is I was looking for people to invite and clicked on a few names on the side. I couldn't tell who was already in the system and didn't want to send duplicates to people who likely already had an invite from other friends. Wouldn't you know, even without hitting the button that sends a message, just because I clicked on a Facebook friend's name from the invite box meant that I ACTUALLY INVITED THEM. It also meant that I couldn't remember who I invited because I THOUGHT I was just testing out the invite functionality so the system would prompt me for confirmation. I had to search through the list and look for the "Follow up" button to see who the lucky three were and then actually send messages. One person that I inadvertently invited would never even bother downloading this and I knew that. I had clicked on their name to see what the invite behavior of Rockmelt was for someone who I knew would not have been in the first wave of invites vs people I suspected were already in the system. 

Bottom line,my assessment is it's too early to see what the best practices are for making browsing social and it's unclear if Rockmelt has it right. From the way they are handling invites, I think there's a long way to go before the experience becomes one that I'd want to use every day. They do have a great icon though, I have to admit.

More to come later, when I have had a little more time to play with it.

Filed under  //  Social Media  
Posted

Data, ePatients, Electronic Health Records (EHR's) and the Future

While teaching a session on Twitter and blogs for healthcare at the Center for Public Health at the Berkeley School of Public Health I met a two employees from Practice Fusion who invited me to their office to talk about their EHR on the web. During the course of our discussions I realized that I didn't have a good grasp of what kinds of laws or regulations would apply to patient data and the assurances of my hosts that they were taking their model from the financial services industry did not fill me with much confidence. I know trying to correct an error in my credit report was a labyrinthine process that took months and I'm not sure if it ever got cleared up.

In an effort to understand the data ownership and rights, I called Kaiser Wahab, an IP lawyer with many years of experience. He corrected my misunderstandings and added some thoughts of his own. He told me that according to the law, no one can own facts - the fact that you are diagnosed with diabetes is not, under the law, something that can be owned. The written RECORDS of the diagnosis and treatments a patient undergoes can be owned and therefore sold, provided there are no privacy laws that prohibit it.

I also talked to Will Crawford, a Health IT expert with Children's Hospital in Boston, who asked the question, do doctors realize the access and rights that they are giving to a private company? How comfortable will they be with their patient data, even if depersonalized and aggregated, being sold to the highest bidder?

Questions I have: Do we want a private company that is not being paid by our healthcare provider to have our health information? Do we want private companies that do not have to disclose any financial information helping to shape health data access policy that will affect us all?

Do we want to have access to aggregate health information to those who can afford it? How much of the access to this data that should be a public good be owned by a private entity?

In the new paradigm where the effective cost of digitized information is free, does it still make sense to stick to the old idea of having health information be concentrated in the hands of doctors, clinicians, insurance companies, and anyone that can afford it?

 

 

Posted

Sprint Developer Day: Ascent of the Developer Community #sprintdev

Sprint had its Developer Conference in Silicon Valley over the past few days and one of the themes was developer relations. There was even a WIP UnPanel: Building a Blueprint for the Best Developer Program. Most of the time was spent in question and answer format, welcoming audience comments.

Imag0160

The five UnPanelists were:

Caroline Lewko, CEO, WIP

Carlo Longino, Community Manager, WIP

Patrick Mork, CMO, GetJar

Mike Rowehl, Founder, Mobile Monday Silicon Valley

Nathan Smith, Sprint Group Manager, Application Developer Program

The discussion centered around how Sprint could make it easier for individual developers. The way the question was being posed, it was the technology solutions that was the focus. What was missing from the discussion was how to foster a viable self-sustaining community from the human standpoint.

The solution to building developer communities isn't to focus on the "How" but the "Why" and the "What". Why should a developer join? What is the quality of the information or relationships? Focusing on the technology that is used leads to the "Build it and they will come." syndrome. For the community to be successful, the basic mechanics of allowing people to connect need to be there, having organized information, and user experience are nice to have. Looking at building communities from a technology standpoint sets up a false discussion. Ultimately the tools that people use to talk to each other is the means but cannot take the place of the content and value of the person to person relationships.

As you build these technologies, focus on the ultimate goal of creating a space for the discussions to happen, the medium will not drive conversation, only good old fashioned community building will.

 

Posted

CTO of HHS Todd Park talking about a hackathon held March 11. #hcsfbay

(download)

Filed under  //  events  
Posted

Day of health hacking at #health2dev w/@GHideas @boltyboy @bluetopaz

(download)

Filed under  //  events  
Posted